Velvet Star Monitor

Standout celebrity highlights with iconic style.

updates

"unpacking" a tuple to call a matching function pointer

Writer Sophia Terry

I'm trying to store in a std::tuple a varying number of values, which will later be used as arguments for a call to a function pointer which matches the stored types.

I've created a simplified example showing the problem I'm struggling to solve:

#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
void f(int a, double b, void* c) { std::cout << a << ":" << b << ":" << c << std::endl;
}
template <typename ...Args>
struct save_it_for_later { std::tuple<Args...> params; void (*func)(Args...); void delayed_dispatch() { // How can I "unpack" params to call func? func(std::get<0>(params), std::get<1>(params), std::get<2>(params)); // But I *really* don't want to write 20 versions of dispatch so I'd rather // write something like: func(params...); // Not legal }
};
int main() { int a=666; double b = -1.234; void *c = NULL; save_it_for_later<int,double,void*> saved = { std::tuple<int,double,void*>(a,b,c), f}; saved.delayed_dispatch();
}

Normally for problems involving std::tuple or variadic templates I'd write another template like template <typename Head, typename ...Tail> to recursively evaluate all of the types one by one, but I can't see a way of doing that for dispatching a function call.

The real motivation for this is somewhat more complex and it's mostly just a learning exercise anyway. You can assume that I'm handed the tuple by contract from another interface, so can't be changed but that the desire to unpack it into a function call is mine. This rules out using std::bind as a cheap way to sidestep the underlying problem.

What's a clean way of dispatching the call using the std::tuple, or an alternative better way of achieving the same net result of storing/forwarding some values and a function pointer until an arbitrary future point?

2

10 Answers

You need to build a parameter pack of numbers and unpack them

template<int ...>
struct seq { };
template<int N, int ...S>
struct gens : gens<N-1, N-1, S...> { };
template<int ...S>
struct gens<0, S...> { typedef seq<S...> type;
};
// ... void delayed_dispatch() { callFunc(typename gens<sizeof...(Args)>::type()); } template<int ...S> void callFunc(seq<S...>) { func(std::get<S>(params) ...); }
// ...
11

The C++17 solution is simply to use std::apply:

auto f = [](int a, double b, std::string c) { std::cout<<a<<" "<<b<<" "<<c<< std::endl; };
auto params = std::make_tuple(1,2.0,"Hello");
std::apply(f, params);

Just felt that should be stated once in an answer in this thread (after it already appeared in one of the comments).


The basic C++14 solution is still missing in this thread. EDIT: No, it's actually there in the answer of Walter.

This function is given:

void f(int a, double b, void* c)
{ std::cout << a << ":" << b << ":" << c << std::endl;
}

Call it with the following snippet:

template<typename Function, typename Tuple, size_t ... I>
auto call(Function f, Tuple t, std::index_sequence<I ...>)
{ return f(std::get<I>(t) ...);
}
template<typename Function, typename Tuple>
auto call(Function f, Tuple t)
{ static constexpr auto size = std::tuple_size<Tuple>::value; return call(f, t, std::make_index_sequence<size>{});
}

Example:

int main()
{ std::tuple<int, double, int*> t; //or std::array<int, 3> t; //or std::pair<int, double> t; call(f, t);
}

DEMO

7

This is a complete compilable version of Johannes' solution to awoodland's question, in the hope it may be useful to somebody. This was tested with a snapshot of g++ 4.7 on Debian squeeze.

###################
johannes.cc
###################
#include <tuple>
#include <iostream>
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
template<int ...> struct seq {};
template<int N, int ...S> struct gens : gens<N-1, N-1, S...> {};
template<int ...S> struct gens<0, S...>{ typedef seq<S...> type; };
double foo(int x, float y, double z)
{ return x + y + z;
}
template <typename ...Args>
struct save_it_for_later
{ std::tuple<Args...> params; double (*func)(Args...); double delayed_dispatch() { return callFunc(typename gens<sizeof...(Args)>::type()); } template<int ...S> double callFunc(seq<S...>) { return func(std::get<S>(params) ...); }
};
#pragma GCC diagnostic push
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-parameter"
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-variable"
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-but-set-variable"
int main(void)
{ gens<10> g; gens<10>::type s; std::tuple<int, float, double> t = std::make_tuple(1, 1.2, 5); save_it_for_later<int,float, double> saved = {t, foo}; cout << saved.delayed_dispatch() << endl;
}
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop

One can use the following SConstruct file

#####################
SConstruct
#####################
#!/usr/bin/python
env = Environment(CXX="g++-4.7", CXXFLAGS="-Wall -Werror -g -O3 -std=c++11")
env.Program(target="johannes", source=["johannes.cc"])

On my machine, this gives

g++-4.7 -o johannes.o -c -Wall -Werror -g -O3 -std=c++11 johannes.cc
g++-4.7 -o johannes johannes.o
2

Here is a C++14 solution.

template <typename ...Args>
struct save_it_for_later
{ std::tuple<Args...> params; void (*func)(Args...); template<std::size_t ...I> void call_func(std::index_sequence<I...>) { func(std::get<I>(params)...); } void delayed_dispatch() { call_func(std::index_sequence_for<Args...>{}); }
};

This still needs one helper function (call_func). Since this is a common idiom, perhaps the standard should support it directly as std::call with possible implementation

// helper class
template<typename R, template<typename...> class Params, typename... Args, std::size_t... I>
R call_helper(std::function<R(Args...)> const&func, Params<Args...> const&params, std::index_sequence<I...>)
{ return func(std::get<I>(params)...); }
// "return func(params...)"
template<typename R, template<typename...> class Params, typename... Args>
R call(std::function<R(Args...)> const&func, Params<Args...> const&params)
{ return call_helper(func,params,std::index_sequence_for<Args...>{}); }

Then our delayed dispatch becomes

template <typename ...Args>
struct save_it_for_later
{ std::tuple<Args...> params; std::function<void(Args...)> func; void delayed_dispatch() { std::call(func,params); }
};
2

This is a bit complicated to achieve (even though it is possible). I advise you to use a library where this is already implemented, namely Boost.Fusion (the invoke function). As a bonus, Boost Fusion works with C++03 compilers as well.

solution. First, some utility boilerplate:

template<std::size_t...Is>
auto index_over(std::index_sequence<Is...>){ return [](auto&&f)->decltype(auto){ return decltype(f)(f)( std::integral_constant<std::size_t, Is>{}... ); };
}
template<std::size_t N>
auto index_upto(std::integral_constant<std::size_t, N> ={}){ return index_over( std::make_index_sequence<N>{} );
}

These let you call a lambda with a series of compile-time integers.

void delayed_dispatch() { auto indexer = index_upto<sizeof...(Args)>(); indexer([&](auto...Is){ func(std::get<Is>(params)...); });
}

and we are done.

index_upto and index_over let you work with parameter packs without having to generate a new external overloads.

Of course, in you just

void delayed_dispatch() { std::apply( func, params );
}

Now, if we like that, in we can write:

namespace notstd { template<class T> constexpr auto tuple_size_v = std::tuple_size<T>::value; template<class F, class Tuple> decltype(auto) apply( F&& f, Tuple&& tup ) { auto indexer = index_upto< tuple_size_v<std::remove_reference_t<Tuple>> >(); return indexer( [&](auto...Is)->decltype(auto) { return std::forward<F>(f)( std::get<Is>(std::forward<Tuple>(tup))... ); } ); }
}

relatively easily and get the cleaner syntax ready to ship.

void delayed_dispatch() { notstd::apply( func, params );
}

just replace notstd with std when your compiler upgrades and bob is your uncle.

7

Thinking about the problem some more based on the answer given I've found another way of solving the same problem:

template <int N, int M, typename D>
struct call_or_recurse;
template <typename ...Types>
struct dispatcher { template <typename F, typename ...Args> static void impl(F f, const std::tuple<Types...>& params, Args... args) { call_or_recurse<sizeof...(Args), sizeof...(Types), dispatcher<Types...> >::call(f, params, args...); }
};
template <int N, int M, typename D>
struct call_or_recurse { // recurse again template <typename F, typename T, typename ...Args> static void call(F f, const T& t, Args... args) { D::template impl(f, t, std::get<M-(N+1)>(t), args...); }
};
template <int N, typename D>
struct call_or_recurse<N,N,D> { // do the call template <typename F, typename T, typename ...Args> static void call(F f, const T&, Args... args) { f(args...); }
};

Which requires changing the implementation of delayed_dispatch() to:

 void delayed_dispatch() { dispatcher<Args...>::impl(func, params); }

This works by recursively converting the std::tuple into a parameter pack in its own right. call_or_recurse is needed as a specialization to terminate the recursion with the real call, which just unpacks the completed parameter pack.

I'm not sure this is in anyway a "better" solution, but it's another way of thinking about and solving it.


As another alternative solution you can use enable_if, to form something arguably simpler than my previous solution:

#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
#include <tuple>
void f(int a, double b, void* c) { std::cout << a << ":" << b << ":" << c << std::endl;
}
template <typename ...Args>
struct save_it_for_later { std::tuple<Args...> params; void (*func)(Args...); template <typename ...Actual> typename std::enable_if<sizeof...(Actual) != sizeof...(Args)>::type delayed_dispatch(Actual&& ...a) { delayed_dispatch(std::forward<Actual>(a)..., std::get<sizeof...(Actual)>(params)); } void delayed_dispatch(Args ...args) { func(args...); }
};
int main() { int a=666; double b = -1.234; void *c = NULL; save_it_for_later<int,double,void*> saved = { std::tuple<int,double,void*>(a,b,c), f}; saved.delayed_dispatch();
}

The first overload just takes one more argument from the tuple and puts it into a parameter pack. The second overload takes a matching parameter pack and then makes the real call, with the first overload being disabled in the one and only case where the second would be viable.

2

My variation of the solution from Johannes using the C++14 std::index_sequence (and function return type as template parameter RetT):

template <typename RetT, typename ...Args>
struct save_it_for_later
{ RetT (*func)(Args...); std::tuple<Args...> params; save_it_for_later(RetT (*f)(Args...), std::tuple<Args...> par) : func { f }, params { par } {} RetT delayed_dispatch() { return callFunc(std::index_sequence_for<Args...>{}); } template<std::size_t... Is> RetT callFunc(std::index_sequence<Is...>) { return func(std::get<Is>(params) ...); }
};
double foo(int x, float y, double z)
{ return x + y + z;
}
int testTuple(void)
{ std::tuple<int, float, double> t = std::make_tuple(1, 1.2, 5); save_it_for_later<double, int, float, double> saved (&foo, t); cout << saved.delayed_dispatch() << endl; return 0;
}
3

a lot of answers have been provided but I found them too complicated and not very natural. I did it another way, without using sizeof or counters. I used my own simple structure (ParameterPack) for parameters to access the tail of parameters instead of a tuple. Then, I appended all the parameters from my structure into function parameters, and finnally, when no more parameters were to be unpacked, I run the function. Here is the code in C++11, I agree that there is more code than in others answers, but I found it more understandable.

template <class ...Args>
struct PackParameters;
template <>
struct PackParameters <>
{ PackParameters() = default;
};
template <class T, class ...Args>
struct PackParameters <T, Args...>
{ PackParameters ( T firstElem, Args... args ) : value ( firstElem ), rest ( args... ) {} T value; PackParameters<Args...> rest;
};
template <class ...Args>
struct RunFunction;
template <class T, class ...Args>
struct RunFunction<T, Args...>
{ template <class Function> static void Run ( Function f, const PackParameters<T, Args...>& args ); template <class Function, class... AccumulatedArgs> static void RunChild ( Function f, const PackParameters<T, Args...>& remainingParams, AccumulatedArgs... args );
};
template <class T, class ...Args>
template <class Function>
void RunFunction<T, Args...>::Run ( Function f, const PackParameters<T, Args...>& remainingParams )
{ RunFunction<Args...>::template RunChild ( f, remainingParams.rest, remainingParams.value );
}
template <class T, class ...Args>
template<class Function, class ...AccumulatedArgs>
void RunFunction<T, Args...>::RunChild ( Function f, const PackParameters<T, Args...>& remainingParams, AccumulatedArgs... args )
{ RunFunction<Args...>:: template RunChild ( f, remainingParams.rest, args..., remainingParams.value );
}
template <>
struct RunFunction<>
{ template <class Function, class... AccumulatedArgs> static void RunChild ( Function f, PackParameters<>, AccumulatedArgs... args ) { f ( args... ); } template <class Function> static void Run ( Function f, PackParameters<> ) { f (); }
};
struct Toto
{ std::string k = "I am toto";
};
void f ( int i, Toto t, float b, std::string introMessage )
{ float res = i * b; std::cerr << introMessage << " " << res << std::endl; std::cerr << "Toto " << t.k << std::endl;
}
int main(){ Toto t; PackParameters<int, Toto, float, std::string> pack ( 3, t, 4.0, " 3 * 4 =" ); RunFunction<int, Toto, float, std::string>::Run ( f, pack ); return 0;
}

I recently had to handle this problem and found the discussion here useful, but the examples a bit cumbersome especially for my usecase using functors. Hopefully my solution will benefit those that come later.

#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
void f(int a, double b, void* c) { std::cout << a << ":" << b << ":" << c << std::endl;
}
template<void func(int, double, void*)>
struct foo { template<class... args_t> constexpr void operator()(args_t... args) { func(args...); } template<class... T, size_t... I> constexpr void operator()(std::tuple<T...>& t, std::index_sequence<I...>) { this->operator()(std::get<I>(std::forward<std::tuple<T...>>(t))...); } template<typename... T> constexpr void operator()(std::tuple<T...>&& t) { this->operator()(t, std::index_sequence_for<T...>{}); }
};
int main() { foo<&f>()(std::make_tuple(1, 45.2, nullptr)); return 0;
}

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.