Velvet Star Monitor

Standout celebrity highlights with iconic style.

updates

The Push-Pull Formula for Quasicoherent Sheaves

Writer Olivia Zamora
$\begingroup$

This is Vakil 16.3 G, self-study.

Suppose $\psi: Z \to Y$ is any morphism, and both $\pi: X \to Y$ and $\pi': W \to Z$ are quasicompact and quasiseparated so that pushforwards send quasicoherent sheaves to quasicoherent sheaves. Suppose $\mathcal F$ is a quasicoherent sheaf on X. Suppose $\psi': W \to X$ commutes the diagram. Describe a natural morphism

$$\psi^* \pi_* \mathcal F \to \pi'_* \psi'^* \mathcal F$$

of quasicoherent sheaves on $Z$.

I started off assuming $X = \operatorname{Spec}A$, $Y = \operatorname{Spec}B$ since we know pullbacks can be taken affine-locally on the target. That would make $\mathcal F \simeq \tilde{M}$ for some $A$-module $M$, so that $\pi_* \mathcal F \simeq \tilde{M_B}$, where $M_B = M \otimes_A B$. Then, for any $\operatorname{Spec}C \subset Z$, we would have $\psi^* \pi_* \mathcal F \simeq \widetilde{M_B \otimes_B C}$ on $\operatorname{Spec} C$, which is naturally isomorphic to $\widetilde{M \otimes_A C}$. But when I run through the same computations using $\operatorname{Spec} D \subset W$ on the other side of the proposed morphism, I get the same result, so it seems as though I am getting an isomorphism, when I know this is incorrect from the following discussion in Vakil.

Where am I going wrong, and what is the most efficient correct argument?

$\endgroup$ 2 Reset to default

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy