Velvet Star Monitor

Standout celebrity highlights with iconic style.

general

Tensor product of two vector spaces

Writer Emily Wong
$\begingroup$

There is something which always intrigue me.

Let $U$ and $V$ be vector spaces over $k$ a field. Is it true that if $U\otimes_{k}V=0$, then $U=0$ or $V=0$.

Note that $U$ and $V$ are not necessarily finite dimensional.

I know that if $\{u\}$ and $\{v\}$ are basis vectors of $U$ and $V$, then $\{u\otimes v\}$ forms a basis for $U\otimes_{k}V$ but

1) where can I find the proof of this?

2) How does this implies conclusion?

3) What is the shortest way of proving this?

Thank you for your help!

$\endgroup$ 2

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

You can find a proof in any algebra textbook that treats tensor products abstractly (i.e. that doesn't "define" $U\otimes_kV$ as "the $k$-vector space with basis $u_i\otimes v_j$ where the $u_i$ form a basis of $U$ and the $v_j$ form a basis of $V$." For example, Hungerford's graduate textbook, or (I'm pretty sure) Keith Conrad's online notes on tensor products (I can't remember if this result is in the first or second set of notes, but I'm pretty sure it's in one of them).

Why does this imply your result? In fact it implies that for $u\in U$ and $v\in V$ both non-zero, $u\otimes v\neq 0$ in $U\otimes_kV$. The reason is that we can choose a basis $\{u_i:i\in I\}$ for $U$ such that $u=u_{i_0}$ for some $i_0\in I$ and a basis $\{v_j:j\in J\}$ for $V$ such that $v=v_{j_0}$ for some $j_0\in J$. According to the result above, $u_{i_0}\otimes v_{j_0}$ is an element of a basis for $U\otimes_kV$. Therefore it can't be zero. In particular $U\otimes_kV\neq 0$ if $U,V\neq 0$.

$\endgroup$ 5 $\begingroup$

I was looking at the flatness of the modules. So hope I am right here!

Here we use the fact that a vector space is a flat module.

So phrasing differently, if $U\otimes_{k}V=0$, and $U\neq 0$, then I must show that $V=0$.

Thus let $u$ be a non-zero element of $u$ and we look at the exact sequence

$0\rightarrow ku\rightarrow U$.

Then by flatness we have

$0\rightarrow ku\otimes_{k}V\rightarrow U\otimes_{k}V$.

By hypothesis, this means that $ku\otimes_{k}V=0$.

Now it remains to show that we have an injection of vector space $V\hookrightarrow ku\otimes_{k}V$ via $v\mapsto u\otimes v$. So suppose $u\otimes v=0$. Then using the universal property

\begin{array}{ccc} ku \times V & & & \\ \downarrow & \searrow & &\\ ku\otimes_{k}V &\rightarrow& V \end{array}

With $f:ku\times V\rightarrow V$ via $f(ku,v)=kv$. This can be checked that it is bilinear. Hence there exists a unique homomorphism $\phi:ku\otimes_{k}V\rightarrow V$ that makes the diagram commutes.

Now, we have $\phi(u\otimes v)=\phi(0)=0=v$. Hence we have an exact sequence

$0\rightarrow V\rightarrow ku\otimes_{k}V$.

But $ku\otimes_{k}V=0$. Hence so is $V$.

Hope I am right here!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy