$\begingroup$

I can imagine a quadrilateral where one of the angles is $180^\circ$. Is this still considered a quadrilateral?

More generally, is every $n$-gon also a $(n+1)$-gon (for $n \ge 3$)?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

If the $n$-gons are allowed to flex (like a planar linkage) it is better to allow degenerate cases with two or more consecutive sides collinear to count as having $n$ sides, because these will be intermediate positions in a motion between convex and concave positions of the linkage. Else you are forced into odd phrases like the flexing polygon having $n$ sides at times $t < t_0$ and instantaneously transforming into an $(n-1)$-gon at time $t_0$ before changing back to its $n$-gonal self at times $t > t_0$.

$\endgroup$ $\begingroup$

No, when we refer to an n-gon, we can't assume that any case of a 180 degree "angle" is an angle, as any side of an n-gon would have infinitely many such "angles" - it would be a nonsense definition. We're interested in angles smaller than 180 degrees.

$\endgroup$ 3

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password Submit

Post as a guest

Post Your Answer Discard

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy