Instrinsic definition of concave and convex polyhedron
Sebastian Wright
Is it possible to distinguish a concave polyhedron from a convex one by mesurements made only on its surface, without a reference to the 3d space around it?
$\endgroup$2 Answers
$\begingroup$No. Consider (a) a pyramid atop a cube (convex), and (b) a cube with a pyramidal piece cut out of one face (not convex). As intrinsic surfaces, these are isometric.
In general, any polyhedron, subtending a solid angle $\Omega<2\pi$ sr at each of its vertices, is called a convex polyhedron.
While any polyhedron, subtending a solid angle $\Omega>2\pi$ sr at any of its vertices, is called a concave polyhedron.
It is very practical that a convex polyhedron has its each vertex elevated (protruding outward) while a concave polyhedron has any of its vertices indented on the surface.
$\endgroup$