Velvet Star Monitor

Standout celebrity highlights with iconic style.

news

Do Diagonal Matrices Always Commute?

Writer Mia Lopez
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be an $n \times n$ matrix and let $\Lambda$ be an $n \times n$ diagonal matrix. Is it always the case that $A\Lambda = \Lambda A$? If not, when is it the case that $A \Lambda = \Lambda A$?

If we restrict the diagonal entries of $\Lambda$ to being the equal (i.e. $\Lambda = \text{drag}(a, a, \dots, a)$), then it is clear that $A\Lambda = AaI = aIA = \Lambda A$. However, I can't seem to come up with an argument for the general case.

$\endgroup$ 1

5 Answers

$\begingroup$

It is possible that a diagonal matrix $\Lambda$ commutes with a matrix $A$ when $A$ is symmetric and $A \Lambda$ is also symmetric. We have

$$ \Lambda A = (A^{\top}\Lambda^\top)^{\top} = (A\Lambda)^\top = A\Lambda $$

The above trivially holds when $A$ and $\Lambda$ are both diagonal.

$\endgroup$ 0 $\begingroup$

A diagonal matrix will not commute with every matrix.

$$ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}*\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$$

But:

$$\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} * \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.$$

$\endgroup$ $\begingroup$

If all the diagonal entries of$\Lambda$ are distinct, it commutes only with diagonal matrices.

In contrast, for each $k$ consecutive equal diagonal entries in $\Lambda,$ we may allow $A$ to have anything at all in the corresponding $k$ by $k$ square block with both corners on the main diagonal.

This means that the set of matrices that commute with $\Lambda$ has a minimum dimension $n$ and a maximum dimension $n^2.$ Suppose we have $r$ different diagonal entries, and there are $k_i$ copies of diagonal entry $\lambda_i.$ Each $k_i \geq 1,$ and we have $$ k_1 + k_2 + \cdots + k_r = n. $$ Then by the block construction I mentioned above, the dimension of the space of matrices that commute with $\Lambda$ is $$ k_1^2 + k_2^2 + \cdots + k_r^2. $$ The minimum is when $r=n,$ so all $k_i = 1,$ and the dimension is $n$

The maximum is when $r=1,$ and $k_1=n,$ the matrix is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix, and the dimension is $n^2.$

$\endgroup$ 2 $\begingroup$

The claim is false in general. Take $A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 2\\3 & 4\end{bmatrix}$ $\Lambda = \begin{bmatrix}2 & 0\\0 & 3\end{bmatrix}$. Then

$A \Lambda = \begin{bmatrix}2 & 6\\6 & 12\end{bmatrix}$

$\Lambda A = \begin{bmatrix}2 & 4\\9 & 12\end{bmatrix}$

On a more useful note, you can look up commuting matrices on Wikipedia.

$\endgroup$ $\begingroup$

The answer from @AOK is not generally true. Obviously for diagonal identical matrix $\Lambda$ is valid only when $A$ is symmetric matrix.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy